1. serious conflict of interest (pro? ton$ !), and $eriou$ly no joke
2. impossible to logically explain that regardless of subset analysis, "proton$ wins".. please
3. survival benefit? maybe* toxicity improvement leading to survival benefit? maybe? nah
4. I'm not buying it, and its unrealistic to expect average H&N treatment to suddenly result in the popup of ton$ of expen$ive proton centers for a cancer making up 3% of the cancer pop.
Thanks for reading. I try to be as clear as one can be on where I am - name of site etc etc. Not sure how to be more obvious. Been part time for a bit - don't need to work but enjoy what we get to do (vast majority of money from 18 yrs on photon side). But sure we all have opinions and biases. So I guess you think they are equivalent or close enough not to matter despite primary and all secondary outcomes - if that's the case, we differ. As I said, most will wait on more data - very reasonable.
1. serious conflict of interest (pro? ton$ !), and $eriou$ly no joke
2. impossible to logically explain that regardless of subset analysis, "proton$ wins".. please
3. survival benefit? maybe* toxicity improvement leading to survival benefit? maybe? nah
4. I'm not buying it, and its unrealistic to expect average H&N treatment to suddenly result in the popup of ton$ of expen$ive proton centers for a cancer making up 3% of the cancer pop.
Thanks for reading. I try to be as clear as one can be on where I am - name of site etc etc. Not sure how to be more obvious. Been part time for a bit - don't need to work but enjoy what we get to do (vast majority of money from 18 yrs on photon side). But sure we all have opinions and biases. So I guess you think they are equivalent or close enough not to matter despite primary and all secondary outcomes - if that's the case, we differ. As I said, most will wait on more data - very reasonable.